4.5 Article

Glycosaminoglycan affinity of the complete fibroblast growth factor family

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1790, Issue 1, Pages 40-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.09.001

Keywords

FGF; Glycosaminoglycan; Heparan sulfate; Chondroitin sulfate

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16570128]
  2. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16570128] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many fibroblast growth factor family proteins (FGFs) bind to the heparan sulfate/heparin (HP) subtypes of sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and a few have recently been reported to also interact with chondroitin sulfate (CS), another sulfated GAG subtype. Methods: To gain additional insight into this interaction, we prepared all currently known FGFs (i.e., FGF1-FGF23) and assessed their affinity for HP, CS-B, CS-D and CS-E. In addition, midkine, hepatocyte growth factor and pleiotrophin were studied as other known HP-binding proteins. Results: We found that members of the FGF19 subfamily (i.e., FGF15,19, 21 and 23) had little or no affinity for HP; all of the other secretable growth factors tested had strong affinities for HP, as was indicated by the finding that their elution from HP-Sepharose columns required 1.0-1.5 M NaCl. We also found that FGF3, 6, 8 and 22 had strong affinities for CS-E, while FGF5 had a moderate affinity for CS-D. The interactions between FGFs and GAGs thus appear to be more diverse than previously understood. General significance: This is noteworthy. as the differential interactions of these growth factors with GAGs may be key determinants of their specific biological activities. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available