4.5 Review

Is the oxidative stress theory of aging dead?

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
Volume 1790, Issue 10, Pages 1005-1014

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.06.003

Keywords

Antioxidant defense; Oxidative stress; oxidative damage; Knockout mice; Transgenic mice; Longevity

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-AG-015908, R01-AG-023843, P01-AG19316, P01AG020591, R37-AG026557]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs
  3. San Antonio Nathan Shock Center for Excellence in the Basic Biology of Aging [P30-AG-13319]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R37AG026557, R01AG023843, P30AG013319, P01AG019316, R01AG015908, P01AG020591] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, the oxidative stress (or free radical) theory of aging is the most popular explanation of how aging occurs at the molecular level. While data from studies in invertebrates (e.g., C. elegans and Drosophila) and rodents show a correlation between increased lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress (and in some cases reduced oxidative damage to macromolecules). direct evidence showing that alterations in oxidative damage/stress play a role in aging are limited to a few studies with transgenic Drosophila that overexpress antioxidant enzymes. Over the past eight years, our laboratory has conducted an exhaustive study on the effect of under- or overexpressing a large number and wide variety of genes coding for antioxidant enzymes. In this review, we present the survival data from these studies together. Because only one (the deletion of the Sod I gene) of the 18 genetic manipulations we studied had an effect on lifespan, our data calls into serious question the hypothesis that alterations in oxidative damage/stress play a role in the longevity of mice. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available