4.6 Article

Different NK cell surface phenotypes defined by the DX9 antibody are due to KIR3DL1 gene polymorphism

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 5, Pages 2992-3001

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.5.2992

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI17892, AI22039] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

KIR3DL1 and KIR3DL2 are NK cell receptors for polymorphic HLA-E and -A determinants. The proportion of NK cells that bind anti-KIR3DL1-specific Ab DX9 and their level of binding vary between individuals. To determine whether these differences are due to KIR polymorphism, we assessed KIR3D gene diversity in unrelated individuals and families. Both KIR3DL1 and KIR3DL2 are highly polymorphic genes, with KIR3DS1 segregating like an allele of KIR3DL1, A KIR haplotype lacking KIR3DL1 and KIR3DS1 was defined, The two KIR3DL1 alleles of a heterozygous donor were expressed by different, but overlapping, subsets of NK cell clones. Sequence variation in KIR3DL1 and KIR3DL2 appear distinct; recombination is more evident in KIR3DL1, and point mutation is more evident in KIR3DL2. The KIR3DL1 genotype correlates well with levels of DX9 binding by NK cells, but not with the frequency of DX9-binding cells. Different KIR3DL1 alleles determine high, low, and no binding of DX9 Ab, Consequently, heterozygotes for high and low binding KIR3DL1 alleles have distinct subpopulations of NK cells that bind DX9 at high and low levels, giving characteristic bimodal distributions in how cytometry, The Z27 Ab gave binding patterns similar to those of DX9, Four KIR3DL1 alleles producing high DX9 binding phenotypes were distinguished from four alleles producing low or no binding phenotypes by substitution at one or more of four positions in the encoded protein: 182 and 283 in the extracellular Ig-like domains, 320 in the transmembrane region, and 373 in the cytoplasmic tail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available