4.7 Article

Detection of nuclear X-ray sources in nearby galaxies with Chandra

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 549, Issue 1, Pages L51-L54

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/319138

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : nuclei; galaxies : Seyfert; X rays : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report preliminary results from an arcsecond-resolution X-ray survey of nearby galaxies using the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer on board the Chandra X-Ray Observatory. The total sample consists of 41 low-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGNs), including Seyfert galaxies, LINERs, and LINER/H II transition objects. In the initial subsample of 24 objects observed thus far, we detect in similar to 62% of the objects a compact, pointlike source astrometrically coincident with either the optical or radio position of the nucleus. The high detection rate strongly suggests that the majority of the objects do contain weakly active, AGN-like cores, presumably powered by central massive black holes. The 2-10 keV luminosities of the nuclear sources range from less than 10(38) to 10(41) ergs s(-1), with a median value of ergs 2 x 10(38) ergs s(-1). Our detection limit corresponds to L-x(2-10 keV) approximate to 8 x 10(37) ergs s(-1) for the typical sample distance of 12 Mpc; this limit is 2 orders of magnitude fainter than the weakest sources of this kind previously studied using ASCA or BeppoSAX. The new data extend toward lower luminosities the known linear correlation between hard X-ray and H alpha luminosity for broad-line AGNs. Many narrow-line objects do contain X-ray cores, consistent with either weak AGNs or X-ray binary systems, but they have X-ray luminosities a factor of 10 below the L-X-L-H alpha relation of the broad-line sources. Their distributions of photon energies show no indication of exceptionally high absorption. The optical line emission in these nuclei is likely powered, at least in part, by stellar processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available