4.6 Article

The Calar Alto Deep Imaging Survey:: K-band galaxy number counts

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 368, Issue 3, Pages 787-796

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010057

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : evolution; galaxy : formation; surveys; infrared : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present K-band number counts for the faint galaxies in the Calar Alto Deep Imaging Survey (CADIS). We covered 4 CADIS fields, a total area of 0.2 deg(2), in the broad band filters B, R and K. We detect about 4000 galaxies in the K-band images, with a completeness limit of K = 19.75 mag, and derive the K-band galaxy number counts in the range of 14.25 < K < 19.75 mag. This is the largest medium deep K-band survey to date in this magnitude range. The B- and R-band number counts are also derived, down to completeness limits of B = 24.75 mag and R = 23.25 mag. The K-selected galaxies in this magnitude range are of particular interest, since some medium deep near-infrared surveys have identified breaks of both the slope of the K-band number counts and the mean B - K color at K = 17 similar to 18 mag. There is, however, a significant disagreement in the K-band number counts among the existing surveys. Our large near-infrared selected galaxy sample allows us to establish the presence of a clear break in the slope at K = 17.0 mag from dlog N/dm = 0.64 at brighter magnitudes to dlog N/dm = 0.36 at the fainter end; We construct no-evolution and passive evolution models, and find that the passive evolution model can simultaneously fit the B-, R- and K-band number counts well. The B - K colors show a clear trend to bluer colors for K > 18 mag. We also find that most of the K = 18-20 mag galaxies have a B - K color bluer than the prediction of a no-evolution model for an L* Sbc galaxy, implying either significant evolution, even for massive galaxies, or the existence of an extra population of small galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available