4.4 Article

Some experiences of professional practice and beneficial changes derived from clinical supervision by community Macmillan nurses

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 21-30

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00209.x

Keywords

community Macmillan nurses; clinical supervision; qualitative research; existential phenomenology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This is a report of an interpretative study that explored some 'lived experiences' of community Macmillan nurses as they recounted them during clinical supervision meetings. This discussion is concerned with serious illness, dying and bereavement and the potential of supervision to reach the 'life-world' of professional practice but also potential benefits for Macmillan nurses. Accounts of professional practice are considered in the context of clinical supervision meetings. Five nurses-four women and one man-undertook individual clinical supervision with the researcher for 6 months over three phases for 18 months in total. Meetings took place in the clinics and health centres in which the Macmillan nurses worked. The method of clinical supervision drew on and developed established ideas from the health science literatures to guide supervisory practice. A synthesis of psychoanalytic ways of thinking and existential phenomenology provided a framework for understanding the data. Five salient themes were identified as emerging from accounts of professional practice: Biographical Determinants, Compulsion, Existential Concerns, Empathic Insufficiency in the Organisation of Palliative Care and Empathic Attainment in the Organisation of Palliative Care. The study shows a need to consider structuring environments that both help and protect community Macmillan nurses and fellow workers. Methods of clinical supervision should be informed by and complement lived experiences of working with serious illness, dying and bereavement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available