4.6 Review

Does fast dissociation from the dopamine D2 receptor explain the action of atypical antipsychotics?:: A new hypothesis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 158, Issue 3, Pages 360-369

Publisher

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.360

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Although atypical antipsychotics are becoming the treatment of choice for schizophrenia, what makes an antipsychotic atypical is not clear. This article provides a new hypothesis about the mechanism of action of atypical antipsychotics. Method: Published data regarding the molecular, animal model, neuroimaging, and clinical aspects of typical and atypical antipsychotics were reviewed to develop this hypothesis. Particular attention was paid to data regarding the role of the serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D-4 receptors in atypicality. Results: Neuroimaging data show that optimal dopamine D-2 occupancy is sufficient to produce the atypical antipsychotic effect. Freedom from motor side effects results from low D-2 occupancy, not from high 5-HT2 occupancy. If D-2 occupancy is excessive, atypicality is lost even in the presence of high 5-HT2 occupancy Animal data show that a rapid dissociation from the D-2 receptor at a molecular level produces the atypical antipsychotic effect. In vitro data show that the single most powerful predictor of atypicality for the current generation of atypical antipsychotics is fast dissociation from the D-2 receptor, not its high affinity at 5-HT2, D-4, or another receptor Conclusions: The authors propose that fast dissociation from the D-2 receptor makes an antipsychotic more accommodating of physiological dopamine transmission, permitting an antipsychotic effect without motor side effects, prolactin elevation, or secondary negative symptoms. in contrast to the multireceptor hypotheses, the authors predict that the atypical antipsychotic effect can be produced by appropriate modulation of the D-2 receptor alone; the blockade of other receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available