4.3 Article

Mortality and quality of life 12 months after myocardial infarction: Effects of depression and anxiety

Journal

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 221-230

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200103000-00005

Keywords

depression; anxiety; myocardial infarction; quality of life; mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of symptoms of depression and anxiety on mortality and quality of life in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: The Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were completed by 288 patients hospitalized for MI. Twelve-month survival status was ascertained, and quality of life among survivors was assessed at 12 months using the Dartmouth COOP charts. Results: Thirty-one (10.8%) patients died. 27 of cardiac causes, during the la-month follow-up. Symptoms of depression and anxiety predicted neither cardiac nor all-cause mortality. Severity of infarction and evidence of heart failure predicted both cardiac and all-cause mortality. The same findings emerged from supplementary analyses of data from patients who died after discharge from the hospital. Symptoms of depression and anxiety, measured at entry, predicted 12-month quality of life among survivors, as did gender, partner status, employment status, living alone, previous frequency of exercise, and indices of disease severity (Killip class and Peel Index). In a multiple regression model in which all of these variables were entered, initial depression scores provided the best independent prediction of quality of life, although living alone, severity of infarction, and state anxiety also entered the model. Conclusions: Symptoms of depression and anxiety did not predict either cardiac or all-cause mortality after MI, but they did predict quality of life among those who lived to 12 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available