4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Vitamin D3 analogs (MC 1288, KH 1060, EB 1089, CS 1558, and CB 1093):: studies on their mechanism of action

Journal

STEROIDS
Volume 66, Issue 3-5, Pages 223-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00152-5

Keywords

vitamin D; analogs; receptor; cell cycle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selected 20-epi and 20-normal vitamin D-3 analogs were studied. First, point mutations were introduced into human vitamin D receptor (VDR) to identify residues important for ligand binding. In helices three, four and five, His229, Asp232, Ser237 and Arg274 seem to have an important role in the binding of calcitriol. Surprisingly, the 20-epi analog MC 1288 did not bind to Ser237. Second, the effects of analogs on VDR degradation were studied. The transcriptionally active 20-epi analogs protected VDR against degradation more efficiently than the 20-normal analogs and calcitriol. With proteasome inhibitor MG-132 formation of Sug-1-RXR beta -VDR-VDRE complex was detected. The 20-epi analogs effectively prevented its formation. Thus, the 20-epi analogs induce a VDR conformation, which prevents binding of factors mediating VDR degradation. Third, the analogs were found to be powerful regulators of cell cycle progression in MG-63 cells. They arrested cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase at lower concentrations and earlier time points than calcitriol. This was accompanied by hypophosphorylation of Rb followed by strong inhibition of Cdk2 activity. This correlated with increased levels of p27. Cdk2 and cyclin E levels were downregulated but those of p21 and cyclin D1 were not affected. Thus, a similar sequence of events with calcitriol and the analogs in inhibiting MG-63 cell growth was detected but the analogs had much longer lasting and stronger effects than calcitriol. A unifying scheme for the varying effects of vitamin D-3 analogs is presented. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available