4.5 Article

Thermal stability of collagen fibers in ethylene glycol

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages 1480-1486

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76120-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism that renders collagen molecules more stable when precipitated as fibers than the same molecules in solution is controversial. According to the polymer-melting mechanism the presence of a solvent depresses the melting point of the polymer due to a thermodynamic mechanism resembling the depression of the freezing point of a solvent due to the presence of a solute. On the other hand, according to the polymer-in-a-box mechanism, the change in configurational entropy of the collagen molecule on denaturation is reduced by its confinement by surrounding molecules in the fiber. Both mechanisms predict an approximately linear increase in the reciprocal of the denaturation temperature with the volume fraction (epsilon) Of solvent, but the polymer-melting mechanism predicts that the slope is inversely proportional to the molecular mass of the solvent (M), whereas the polymer-in-a-box mechanism predicts a slope that is independent of A/I. Differential scanning calorimetry was used to measure the denaturation temperature of collagen in different concentrations of ethylene glycol (M = 62) and the slope found to be (7.29 +/- 0.37) x 10(-4) K-1, compared with (7.31 +/- 0.42) x 10-4 K-1 for water (M = 18). This behavior was consistent with the polymer-in-a-box mechanism but conflicts with the polymer-melting mechanism. Calorimetry showed that the enthalpy of denaturation of collagen fibers in ethylene glycol was high, varied only slowly within the glycol volume fraction range 0.2 to 1, and fell rapidly at low epsilon. That this was caused by the disruption of a network of hydrogen-bonded glycol molecules surrounding the collagen is the most likely explanation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available