4.7 Article

Short-term oval administration of L-arginine improves hemodynamics and exercise capacity in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.2007116

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to assess the effects of oral supplementation of L-arginine, the precursor of nitric oxide (NO), on hemodynamics and exercise capacity in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Acute hemodynamic responses to oral I-arginine (0.5 g/10 kg body weight) or placebo were examined in 19 patients with primary or precapillary secondary pulmonary hypertension. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed to measure peak oxygen consumption (peak (V) over dot O-2) and the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide production ((V) over dot E (V) over dot CO2 slope) before and 1 wk after treatment with L-arginine (1.5 g/10 kg body weight/d) or placebo. Oral supplementation of L-arginine significantly increased plasma L-citrulline, which indicated enhancement of NO production. Supplemental L-arginine produced a 9% decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (53 +/- 4 to 48 +/- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and a 16% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (14.8 1.5 to 12.4 +/- 1.4 Wood units, p < 0.05). L-arginine modestly decreased mean systemic arterial pressure (92 4 to 87 +/- 3 mm Hg, p < 0.05). A 1-wk supplementation of L-arginine resulted in a slight increase in peak V over dot o(2) (831 88 to 896 +/- 92 ml/min, p < 0.05) and a significant decrease in the (V) over dot E- (V) over dot CO2 slope (43 4 to 37 +/- 3, p < 0.05) without significant systemic hypotension. Hemodynamics and exercise capacity remained unchanged during placebo administration. These results suggest that oral supplementation of L-arginine may have beneficial effects on hemodynamics and exercise capacity in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available