4.5 Article

A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes

Journal

HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 153, Issue 1-2, Pages 43-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00256-2

Keywords

human cochlear neuron; electrical stimulation; activating function; computer simulation; auditory nerve; compartment model; unmyelinated spiral ganglion cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differences in neural geometry and the fact that the soma of the human cochlear neuron typically is not myelinated are reasons for disagreements between single fiber recordings in animals and the neural code evoked in cochlear implant patients. We introduce a compartment model of the human cochlear neuron to study the excitation and propagation process of action potentials. The model can be used to predict (i) the points of spike generation, (ii) the time difference between stimulation and the arrival of a spike at the proximal end of the central axon, (iii) the vanishing of peripherally evoked spikes at the soma region under specific conditions, (iv) the influence of electrode positions on spiking behavior, and (v) consequences of the loss of the peripheral axon. Every subunit of the cochlear neuron is separately modeled. Ion channel dynamics are described by a modified Hodgkin-Huxley model. Influence of membrane noise is taken into account. Additionally, the generalized activating function is introduced as a tool to give an envision of the origin of spikes in the peripheral and in the central axon without any knowledge of the gating processes in the active membranes. Comparing the reactions of a human and cat cochlear neuron, we find differences in spiking behavior, e.g, peripherally and centrally evoked spikes arrive with a time difference of about 400 mus in man and 200 mus in cat. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available