4.4 Article

Male gender is associated with deficit schizophrenia:: a meta-analysis

Journal

SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 2-3, Pages 141-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00231-5

Keywords

confounding; deficit syndrome; etiology; gender; (schizophrenia)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An association between deficit schizophrenia and male gender could be expected, since male schizophrenic subjects have been repeatedly found more severe than females on several dimensions of severity. Surprisingly, very few studies have confirmed such an association. We performed a more definitive test of this association using a meta-analysis. A pooled odds ratio was computed based on the 23 studies that reported the gender ratio in deficit vs, non-deficit schizophrenia. We tested for the heterogeneity of the association and examined the potential impact of the sampling method, the method used to assess the deficit syndrome, the breadth of diagnoses included and the mean duration of illness. A highly significant association between male gender and deficit schizophrenia was observed (pooled odds ratio = 1.75). There was no definitive evidence that differences across studies in sampling methods, breadth of diagnoses included, mean duration of illness and methods to assess the deficit syndrome affected the strength of the association. However, the studies using the 'Proxy Deficit Syndrome' method to assess the deficit syndrome yielded qualitatively weaker evidence. This significant association between male gender and deficit schizophrenia may reflect the influence of a gender related factor (e.g. sexual hormones) or gender differences in the liability to different etiologies of schizophrenia. The role of gender as a potential confounder must be closely examined in studies comparing deficit and non-deficit SZ. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available