4.5 Article

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanoparticle and poly(-caprolactone) electrospun scaffold characterization for skeletal muscle regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages 3633-3641

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35481

Keywords

poly(3; 4-ethylenedioxythiophene); poly(-caprolactone); conductive nanoparticles; electrospinning; fibrous scaffolds

Funding

  1. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1408202] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Injuries to peripheral nerves and/or skeletal muscle can cause scar tissue formation and loss of function. The focus of this article is the creation of a conductive, biocompatible scaffold with appropriate mechanical properties to regenerate skeletal muscle. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) nanoparticles (Np) were electrospun with poly(-caprolactone) (PCL) to form conductive scaffolds. During electrospinning, ribboning, larger fiber diameters, and unaligned scaffolds were observed with increasing PEDOT amounts. To address this, PEDOT Np were sonicated prior to electrospinning, which resulted in decreased conductivity and increased mechanical properties. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) were added to the 1:2 solution in an effort to increase conductivity. However, the addition of MWCNT had little effect on scaffold conductivity, and the elastic modulus and yield stress of the scaffold increased as a result. Rat muscle cells attached and were active on the 1-10, 1-2, 3-4, and 1-1 PCL-PEDOT scaffolds; however, the 3-4 scaffolds had the lowest level of metabolic activity. Although the scaffolds were cytocompatible, further development of the fabrication method is necessary to produce more highly aligned scaffolds capable of promoting skeletal muscle cell alignment and eventual regeneration. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 3633-3641, 2015.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available