4.7 Article

Focal liver lesions: Comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 397-401

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1057

Keywords

liver; MR; CT; contrast agents; focal liver lesion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to compare dual-phase spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using dynamic gadolinium enhancement for liver lesion detection and characterization. Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent dual-phase spiral CT and MRI for the evaluation of focal liver disease within a I-month period. Spiral CT and MR images were interpreted prospectively, in a blinded fashion by separate, Individual experienced investigators, to determine lesion detection and characterization. Liver lesions were confirmed by surgery and pathology in 6 patients, and by clinical and imaging follow-up in the other 16 patients. Pathological correlation of a primary extrahepatic malignancy was available in 5 of the 16 patients who had metastatic liver disease. Spiral CT and NM detected 53 and 63 lesions, and characterized 39 and 62 true positive lesions, respectively. A kappa statistic test was applied to assess agreement between MR and CT results. MR versus CT for lesion detection resulted In a kappa statistic of 0.54 (95% confidence interval), indicating moderate agreement, and 0.32 (95% confidence interval) for lesion characterization, Indicating only slight agreement. More lesions were detected on MR images than CT images in 6 (27%) patients, with lesions detected only on MR images in 4 (18%) patients. More lesions were characterized on MR Images in 9 (41%) patients. In 9 patients with a discrepancy between MR and CT findings, the MR images added information considered significant to patient management in all 9 cases. MRI was moderately superior to dual-phase spiral CT for lesion detection, and was markedly superior for lesion characterization, with these differences having clinical significance. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available