Journal
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 309-320Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0146167201273005
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Two experiments examined individual and group decision making when decision criteria led to outcomes that violated distributive justice. In Experiment I, noncompliant individual jurors in a civil trial biased their determinations of negligence to award damages when the decision criteria prohibited an award. Experiment 2. replicated this effect at the group level and revealed that juries also biased their attributions of negligence to justify reducing damages when the decision criteria required an excessive award. In both cases of noncompliance, juries recruited a biased subset of information during deliberations that sustained their decisions. Finally, noncompliant juries were marked by the advent of a trigger person who raised justice concerns. Implications for other decision-making groups and for the courts are discussed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available