4.5 Article

Modeling cancer glycolysis

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
Volume 1807, Issue 6, Pages 755-767

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.11.006

Keywords

Metabolic control analysis; Flux-control coefficient; Hexokinase; Phosphofructokinase type 1; Glucose transporter; Combined therapy

Funding

  1. CONACyT-Mexico [80534, 123636, 83084]
  2. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnologia del Distrito [PICS08-5]
  3. CONACyT [59991]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most cancer cells exhibit an accelerated glycolysis rate compared to normal cells. This metabolic change is associated with the over-expression of all the pathway enzymes and transporters (as induced by HIF-1 alpha and other oncogenes), and with the expression of hexokinase (HK) and phosphofructokinase type 1 (PFK-1) isoenzymes with different regulatory properties. Hence, a control distribution of tumor glycolysis, modified from that observed in normal cells, can be expected. To define the control distribution and to understand the underlying control mechanisms, kinetic models of glycolysis of rodent AS-30D hepatoma and human cervix HeLa cells were constructed with experimental data obtained here for each pathway step (enzyme kinetics; steady-state pathway metabolite concentrations and fluxes). The models predicted with high accuracy the fluxes and metabolite concentrations found in living cancer cells under physiological O-2 and glucose concentrations as well as under hypoxic and hypoglycemic conditions prevailing during tumor progression. The results indicated that HK >= HP1 > GLUT in AS-30D whereas glycogen degradation >= GLUT > HK in HeLa were the main flux- and ATP concentration-control steps. Modeling also revealed that, in order to diminish the glycolytic flux or the ATP concentration by 50%, it was required to decrease GLUT or HK or HPI by 76% (AS-30D), and GLUT or glycogen degradation by 87-99% (HeLa), or decreasing simultaneously the mentioned steps by 47%. Thus, these proteins are proposed to be the foremost therapeutic targets because their simultaneous inhibition will have greater antagonistic effects on tumor energy metabolism than inhibition of all other glycolytic, non-controlling, enzymes. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Bioenergetics of Cancer. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available