4.6 Article

Gas and dust exposure in underground construction is associated with signs of airway inflammation

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 416-421

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.01.17304160

Keywords

acoustic rhinometry; airway inflammation; exhaled nitric oxide; dust and gas exposure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure to gases and dust may induce airway inflammation. It was hypothesized that heavy construction workers who had been exposed to dust and gases in underground construction work for 1 yr, would have early signs of upper and lower airway inflammation, as compared to outdoor workers. A study group comprising 29 nonsmoking underground concrete workers (mean I so age 44 +/- 12 yrs), and a reference group of 26 outdoor concrete workers (39 +/- 12 yrs) were examined by acoustic rhinometry, nasal and exhaled nitric oxide spirometry and a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. Exposure measurements mere carried out. The underground workers had higher exposure to total and respirable dust, a-quartz and nitrogen dioxide than the references (p < 0.001). The occurrence of respiratory symptoms was higher in the underground workers than in the references (p < 0.05). exhaled nitric oxide Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) (geometric mean +/- SEM) was higher in the underground workers than in the references (8.4 +/- 1.09 versus 5.6 +/- 1.07 parts per billion (ppb), p = 0.001), whereas spirometric values mere comparable. The underground workers had smaller nasal cross-sectional area and volume than the references, and more pronounced increases after decongestion (p < 0.001). To conclude the exposure in underground construction may cause nasal mucosal swelling and increased levels of exhaled nitric oxide, indicating signs of upper and lower airway inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available