4.3 Article

Feeding frequency affects growth, not fillet composition, of juvenile sunshine bass Morone chrysops x M-saxatilis grown in cages

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 79-88

Publisher

WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2001.tb00925.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an effort to feed sunshine bass Ml,rone chrysops X M. suxatilis efficiently. promote optimal growth, and reduce labor costs associated with feeding. sunshine bass were grown in cages and fed one of four feeding frequencies: once/d. twice/d. once every other day (1X/EOD), and twice every other day (2X/EOD) for 21 wk. Juvenile sunshine bass were fed a commercial floating diet containing 40% protein and 11.5% lipid. One hundred fish were hand-counted and stocked into each of 12 3.5-m(3) cages with three replications per treatment. At the conclusion of the study. percentage weight gain of sunshine bass fed twice/d was significantly (P < 0.05) higher (1.850%) compared to fish fed all other feeding frequencies. Specific growth rate (SGR) of fish fed twice/d was significantly higher (2.1%/d) compared to fish fed all other feeding regimes. while fish fed once/d had a higher SGR (2.0%/d) compared to fish fed 1X/EOD (1.6%/d) and 2X/EOD (1.8%/d). Percentage survival was not significantly different (P > 0.05) among all treatments and averaged 70.4%. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) of fish fed twice/d was significantly higher (2.40) compared to fish fed all other feeding regimes. Percentage fillet weight of fish fed twice/d was significantly higher (27.8%) compared to all other treatments. Percentage moisture, protein, lipid. and ash in fillet were not significantly different among all treatments and averaged 75.7%, 19.4%, 3.5%, and 1.2%, respectively (wet-weight basis). Based upon data from the present study. it appears that producers growing juvenile sunshine bass in cages may want to feed fish twice daily. This feeding regimen allows for higher growth rates, without adverse effects on body or fillet compositions. However, economic analysis needs to be conducted to determine if feeding twice/d is profitable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available