4.7 Article

Stress-induced changes in peripheral natural killer cell cytotoxicity in pigs may not depend on plasma cortisol

Journal

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 54-64

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/brbi.2000.0583

Keywords

cortisol; immobilization stress; LGL; NK cytotoxicity; pigs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examined cortisol (COR) involvement in stress-related changes in natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC). The relationship between blood COR level, phasic changes in NKCC, and the number of large granular lymphocytes (LGL) was examined in pigs during the course of 4-h immobilization stress (TMB) and for 6 days after its termination. NKCC was determined using 18-h Cr-51-release assay, LGL number was assessed with a standard hematological method, and plasma COR level was measured by radioimmunoassay. The blood level of COR was increasing during IMB (max 446 Delta% at the second hour) and decreased after its termination (max -59 Delta% on day 2). Changes in NKCC level and LGL number were biphasic; i.e., an initial increase in both measures (NKCC max 24 Delta%, LGL max 18 Delta%) in an early phase of stress (0-1h) was followed by their subsequent decrease (NKCC max -35 Delta 470, LGL max -41 Delta%) in the late phase (3-4 h) of stress, which persisted for several days after termination of IMB. Thus, in the early phase of stress, there was a positive correlation between NKCC, LGL number, and COR levels tall elevated); a positive correlation between the measures also occurred after termination of IMB (all. decreased). A negative correlation between COR and NKCC, which might be indicative of COR-related immunosuppression, was found only in the late (3-4 h) phase of stress. It is concluded that COR may be only one of multiple factors (possibly antagonistic) determining an actual immune response during stress. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available