4.7 Article

Structural basis for the ADP-specificity of a novel glucokinase from a hyperthermophilic archaeon

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 205-214

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00577-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: ATP is the most common phosphoryl group donor for kinases. However, certain hyperthermophilic archaea such as Thermococcus litoralis and Pyrococcus furiosus utilize unusual ADP-dependent glucokinases and phosphofructokinases in their glycolytic pathways. These ADP-dependent kinases are homologous to each other but show no sequence similarity to any of the hitherto known ATP-dependent enzymes. Results: We solved the crystal structure at 2.3 Angstrom resolution of an ADP-dependent glucokinase from T, litoralis (tIGK) complexed with ADP. The overall structure can be divided into large and small alpha/beta domains, and the ADP molecule is buried in a shallow pocket in the large domain. Unexpectedly, the structure was similar to those of two ATP-dependent kinases, ribokinase and adenosine kinase. Comparison based on three-dimensional structure revealed that several motifs important both in structure and function are conserved, and the recognition of the alpha- and beta -phosphate of the ADP in the tIGK was almost identical with the recognition of the beta- and gamma -phosphate of ATP in these ATP-dependent kinases. Conclusions: Noticeable points of our study are the first structure of ADP-dependent kinase, the structural similarity to members of the ATP-dependent ribokinase family, its rare nucleotide specificity caused by a shift in nucleotide binding position by one phosphate unit, and identification of the residues that discriminate ADP-and ATP-dependence. The strict conservation of the binding site for the terminal and adjacent phosphate moieties suggests a common ancestral origin of both the ATP- and ADP-dependent kinases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available