4.7 Article

Chronic exposure to nicotine upregulates the human α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor function

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1819-1829

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-01819.2001

Keywords

acetylcholine; nicotinic receptor; alpha 4 beta 2; nicotine; upregulation; nicotine addiction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Widely expressed in the brain, the alpha4 beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is proposed to play a major role in the mechanisms that lead to and maintain nicotine addiction. Using the patch-clamp technique and pharmacological protocols, we examined the consequences of long-term exposure to 0.1-10 muM nicotine in K-177 cells expressing the major human brain alpha4 beta2 receptor. The acetylcholine dose-response curves are biphasic and revealed both a high- and a low-affinity component with apparent EC50 values of 1.6 and 62 muM. Ratios of receptors in the high- and low-affinity components are 25 and 75%, respectively. Chronic exposure to nicotine or nicotinic antagonists [dihydro-beta -erytroidine (DH betaE) or methyllycaconitine (MLA)] increases the fraction of high-affinity receptors up to 70%. Upregulated acetylcholine-evoked currents increase by twofold or more and are less sensitive to desensitization. Functional upregulation is independent of protein synthesis as shown by the lack of effect of 20 muM cycloheximide. Single-channel currents recorded with 100 nM acetylcholine show predominantly high conductances (38.8 and 43.4 pS), whereas additional smaller conductances (16.7 and 23.5 pS) were observed with 30 muM acetylcholine. In addition, long-term exposure to dihydro-beta -erytroidine increases up to three times the frequency of channel openings. These data indicate, in contrast to previous studies, that human alpha4 beta2 nAChRs are functionally upregulated by chronic nicotine exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available