4.7 Article

Radiation response and cure rate of human colon adenocarcinoma spheroids of different size: The significance of hypoxia on tumor control modelling

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01533-9

Keywords

WiDr spheroids; hypoxia; clonogenic cells; tumor control; cell survival assays

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the adequacy of a Poisson tumor control probability (tcp) model and the impact of hypoxia on tumor cure. Methods and Materials: A human colon adenocarcinoma cell line, WiDr, was grown as multicellular spheroids df different diameters, Measurements were made of cell survival and spheroid cure following 300-kV X-ray external beam irradiation in air and nitrogen. Cell survival data were fitted using a two-compartment and an oxygen diffusion model. Spheroid cure data were fitted using the icp model. Results: Hypoxia was seen only for spheroids greater than 500 mum in diameter. For small spheroids rep estimates of radiosensitivity and clonogenic number showed excellent agreement with experimentally derived values. For large spheroids, although tcp estimates of radiosensitivity were comparable with measurements, estimates of the clonogenic number were considerably lower than the experimental count. Reoxygenation of large spheroids before irradiation resulted in the icp estimates of the number of clonogenic cells agreeing with measured values. Conclusions: When hypoxia was absent, the tcp model accurately predicted cure from measured radiosensitivity and clonogen number. When hypoxia was present, the number of cells capable of regrowth in situ was considerably lower than the number of clonogenic cells that initially survived irradiation. As this counteracted the decreased radiosensitivity, hypoxia was less important for cure than predicted from cell survival assays. This finding suggests that chronic hypoxia may not Limit directly the success of radiation therapy. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available