4.6 Article

Solution structure of the yeast copper transporter domain Ccc2a in the apo and Cu(I)-loaded states

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 276, Issue 11, Pages 8415-8426

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M008389200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [5T32ES07284] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM054111, GM 54111] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ccc2 is an intracellular copper transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is a physiological target of the copper chaperone Atx1. Here we describe the solution structure of the first N-terminal MTCXXC metal-binding domain, Ccc2a, both in the presence and absence of Cu(I). For Cu(I)-Ccc2a, 1944 meaningful nuclear Overhauser effects were used to obtain a family of 35 structures with root mean square deviation to the average structure of 0.36 +/- 0.06 Angstrom for the backbone and 0.79 +/- 0.05 Angstrom for the heavy atoms. For apo Ccc2a, 1970 meaningful nuclear Overhauser effects have been used with 35 (3)J(HNH alpha) to obtain a family of 35 structures with root mean square deviation to the average structure of 0.38 +/- 0.06 Angstrom for the backbone and 0.82 +/- 0.07 Angstrom for the heavy atoms. The protein exhibits a beta alpha beta beta alpha beta, ferrodoxin-like fold similar to that of its target Atx1 and that of a human counterpart, the fourth metal-binding domain of the Menkes protein. The overall fold remains unchanged upon copper loading, but the copper-binding site itself becomes less disordered. The helical context of the copper-binding site, and the copper-induced conformational changes in Ccc2a differ from those in Atx1, Ccc2a presents a conserved acidic surface which complements the basic surface of Atx1 and a hydrophobic surface. These results open new mechanistic aspects of copper transporter domains with physiological copper donor and acceptor proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available