4.7 Article

Supermassive black holes in bulges

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 550, Issue 1, Pages 65-74

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/319724

Keywords

black hole physics; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; galaxies : nuclei

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present spatially extended gas kinematics at parsec-scale resolution for the nuclear regions of four nearby disk galaxies and model them as rotation of a gas disk in the joint potential of the stellar bulge and a putative central black hole. The targets were selected from a larger set of long-slit spectra obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope as part of the Survey of Nearby Nuclei with STIS. They represent the four galaxies (of 24) that display symmetric gas velocity curves consistent with a rotating disk. We derive the stellar mass distribution from the STIS acquisition images adopting the stellar mass-to-light ratio normalized to match ground-based velocity dispersion measurements over a large aperture. Subsequently, we constrain the mass of a putative black hole by matching the gas rotation curve, following two distinct approaches. In the most general case we explore all the possible disk orientations; alternatively, we constrain the gas disk orientation from the dust-lane morphology at similar radii. In the latter case the kinematic data indicate the presence of a central black hole for three of the four objects, with masses of 10(7)-10(8) M., representing up to similar to0.025% of the host bulge mass. For one object (NGC 2787) the kinematic data alone provide clear evidence for the presence of a central black hole even without external constraints on the disk orientation. These results illustrate directly the need to determine black hole masses by differing methods for a large number of objects, demonstrate that the variance in black hole/bulge mass is much larger than previously claimed, and reinforce the recent finding that the black hole mass is tightly correlated with the bulge stellar velocity dispersion sigma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available