4.7 Article

The magnetic decoupling stage of star formation

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 550, Issue 1, Pages 314-333

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/319703

Keywords

ISM : magnetic fields; MHD; plasmas; stars : formation; solar system : formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of the first numerical calculations to model magnetic decoupling in a collapsing molecular cloud core. Magnetic decoupling is the stage during which the motion of the neutrals ceases to significantly affect the magnetic field strength and the magnetic field ceases to significantly affect this motion. We have analyzed the resistivity of a weakly ionized, magnetic gas, and we have separated the contributions of ohmic dissipation and ambipolar diffusion. The chemical model used to determine the abundances of ionized particles accounts for, among other things, a distribution of grain radii. The evolution of an axisymmetric, magnetic molecular cloud core is followed from central densities of 300 to 2x10(12) cm(-3). Typically, magnetic decoupling begins at a central density of 3x10(10) cm(-3) and is complete by a density of 2x10(12) cm(-3). We find that the mechanism responsible for magnetic decoupling is ambipolar diffusion, not ohmic dissipation, and that decoupling precedes the formation of a central stellar object. When the central density is a few times 10(12) cm(-3), a nearly uniform magnetic field of B(dec) approximate to 0.1 G extends over a region approximate to 20 AU in radius that contains a mass approximate to0.01 M(.). This value of B(dec) is consistent with measurements of remanent magnetization in meteorites. Magnetic decoupling at this stage is not accompanied by hydromagnetic shocks. We estimate that the magnetic flux problem II of star formation is resolved by ambipolar diffusion before the magnetic field is refrozen in the matter because of thermal ionization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available