4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The use of gene knockout mice to unravel the mechanisms of toxicity and chemical carcinogenesis

Journal

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 1-3, Pages 199-208

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00296-X

Keywords

xenobiotic; cytochrome p450; gene knockout; carcinogenesis; peroxisome proliferators

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolism of toxins and carcinogens is carried out by large groups of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes. These enzymes are generally considered to be required for elimination of xenobiotics such as drugs, dietary chemicals and environmental pollutants, and to be required for chemical toxicity and carcinogenicity. An important role for these enzymes in metabolism of endogenous chemicals has not been established. Mouse lines in which the genes encoding several xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes were knocked out were produced and are being used to determine the role of metabolism in carcinogenesis, and acute and chronic toxicities in vivo. Mouse lines lacking the P450s CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1 and CYP2E1. microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase and the glutathione S-transferase P1 have no deleterious phenotypes, indicating that these enzymes are not required for mammalian development and physiological homeostasis. However, when challenged with toxins and carcinogens, they respond differently from their wild-type (WT) counterparts. For example, mice lacking CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 are totally resistant to acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Mice lacking CYP1B1 or mEH are less responsive to tumorigenesis by 7,12-dimethybenz[a]anthracene. However, CYP1A2-null mice do not significantly differ from WT mice in their response to the hepatocarcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl. These and other studies indicate that the xenobiotic-metabolism null mice are of great value in the study of the mechanisms of chemical injury. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available