4.1 Article

Folate status in women of childbearing age residing in Southern California after folic acid fortification

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 129-134

Publisher

AMER COLL NUTRITION
DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719024

Keywords

folate; fortification; homocysteine; MTHFR; women; folic acid

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06GM53933] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate folate status in healthy, nonpregnant women (18 to 45 years) following folic acid (FA) fortification of the food supply. Design: This was a cross-sectional study design in which a fasting blood sample was obtained from socio-economically advantaged (n=85) and disadvantaged (n=50) women residing in Southern California who had not consumed supplemental FA within the past 12 months. Serum folate (SF), red cell folate (RCF) and plasma homocysteine (tHcy) concentrations were measured and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype (C677T) was determined. Results: SF and RCF concentrations (mean+/-SD) for socio-economically advantaged (54+/-18, 1387+/-329 nmol/L, respectively) and disadvantaged women (41+/-18, 1172+/-342 nmol/L, respectively) greatly exceeded the levels deemed acceptable for SF (greater than or equal to 13.6 nmol/L) and RCF (greater than or equal to 362 nmol/L). Moreover, 95% of socio-economically advantaged (5.2+/-1.6 mu mol/L) and disadvantaged women (6.1+/-1.6 mu mol/L) were within the lower limit of normal range and indicative of adequate folate status. For the combined groups (n=135), the frequency of the C/C, C/T and T/T genotype was 56.0, 37.3 and 6.7%, respectively. MTHFR genotype was not associated with SF, RCF or tHcy. Conclusions: These data suggest that women of childbearing age are achieving positive folate balance and RCF concentrations associated with reduced risk of NTD following FA fortification of the food supply.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available