4.4 Article

Interactions of surfactant proteins A and D with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus fumigatus

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 2037-2044

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2037-2044.2001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R37 HL029891, HL-45286, HL-29891, R01 HL029891] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) are members of the collectin family of calcium-dependent lectins and are important pulmonary host defense molecules. Human SP-A and SP-D and rat SP-D bind to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia, but the ligand remains unidentified. To identify a fungal ligand for SP-A and/or SP-D, we examined the interactions of the proteins with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SP-D but not SP-A bound yeast cells, and EDTA inhibited the binding. SP-D also aggregated yeast cells and isolated yeast cell walls. Treating yeast cells to remove cell wall mannoprotein did not reduce SP-D binding, and SP-D failed to aggregate chitin. However, SP-D aggregated yeast glucan before and after treatment with a beta (1 -->3)-glucanase, suggesting a specific interaction between the collectin and beta (1 -->6)-glucan. In support of this idea, SP-D-induced yeast aggregation was strongly inhibited by pustulan [a beta (1 -->6)-linked glucose homopolymer] but was not inhibited by laminarin [a beta (1 -->3)-linked glucose homopolymer]. Additionally, pustulan but not laminarin strongly inhibited SP-D binding to A. fumigatus. The pustulan concentration for 50% inhibition of SP-D binding to A. fumigatus is 1.0 +/- 0.3 muM glucose equivalents. Finally, SP-D showed reduced binding to the beta (1 -->6)-glucan-deficient kre6 yeast mutant. Taken together, these observations demonstrate that beta (1 -->6)-glucan is an important fungal ligand for SP-D and that glycosidic bond patterns alone can determine if an extended carbohydrate polymer is recognized by SP-D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available