4.5 Article

An approach for patient-specific multi-domain vascular mesh generation featuring spatially varying wall thickness modeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 48, Issue 10, Pages 1972-1981

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.006

Keywords

Aneurysm; Vascular mesh generation; Cardiovascular biomechanics; Multi-domain; Finite element analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (United States of America) [R15HL087268]
  2. Carnegie Mellon University
  3. University of Texas System Board of Regents' Science and Technology Acquisition and Retention program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we present a computationally efficient image-derived volume mesh generation approach for vasculatures that implements spatially varying patient-specific wall thickness with a novel inward extrusion of the wall surface mesh. Multi-domain vascular meshes with arbitrary numbers, locations, and patterns of both iliac bifurcations and thrombi can be obtained without the need to specify features or landmark points as input. In addition, the mesh output is coordinate-frame independent and independent of the image grid resolution with high dimensional accuracy and mesh quality, devoid of errors typically found in off-the-shelf image-based model generation workflows. The absence of deformable template models or Cartesian grid-based methods enables the present approach to be sufficiently robust to handle aneurysmatic geometries with highly irregular shapes, arterial branches nearly parallel to the image plane, and variable wall thickness. The assessment of the methodology was based on i) estimation of the surface reconstruction accuracy, ii) validation of the output mesh using an aneurysm phantom, and iii) benchmarking the volume mesh quality against other frameworks. For the phantom image dataset (pixel size 0.105 mm; slice spacing 0.7 mm; and mean wall thickness 1.401 +/- 0.120 mm), the average wall thickness in the mesh was 1.459 +/- 0.123 mm. The absolute error in average wall thickness was 0.060 +/- 0.036 mm, or about 8.6% of the largest image grid spacing (0.7 mm) and 4.36% of the actual mean wall thickness. Mesh quality metrics and the ability to reproduce regional variations of wall thickness were found superior to similar alternative frameworks. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available