4.4 Article

Structure and Dynamics of the Fish Eye Lens Protein, γM7-Crystallin

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 52, Issue 20, Pages 3579-3587

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi400151c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R21EY018423, R0IAG031903]
  2. NEI intramural program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The vertebrate eye lens contains high concentrations of. crystallins. The dense lenses of fish are particularly abundant in a class called gamma M-crystallin whose members are characterized by an unusually high methionine content and partial loss of the four tryptophan residues conserved in all gamma-crystallins from mammals which are proposed to contribute to protection from UV-damage. Here, we present the structure and dynamics of gamma M7-crystallin from zebrafish (Danio rerio). The solution structure shares the typical two-domain, four-Greek-key motif arrangement of other gamma-crystallins, with the major difference noted in the final loop of the N-terminal domain, spanning residues 65-72. This is likely due to the absence of the conserved tryptophans. Many of the methionine residues are exposed on the surface but are mostly well and frequently have contacts with aromatic side chains. This may contribute to the specialized surface properties of these proteins that exist under high molecular crowding in the fish lens. NMR relaxation data show increased backbone conformational motions in the loop regions of gamma M7 compared to those of mouse gamma S-crystallin and show that fast internal motion of the interdomain linker in gamma-crystallins correlates with linker length. Unfolding studies monitored by tryptophan fluorescence confirm results from mutant mouse gamma S-crystallin and show that unfolding of a beta gamma-crystallin domain likely starts from unfolding of the variable loop containing the more fluorescently quenched tryptophan residue, resulting in a native like unfolding intermediate

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available