Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 304-310Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.178.4.304
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Major depression is highly recurrent. Antidepressant maintenance treatment has proven efficacy against recurrent depression. Aims Comparison of prophylactic efficacy of citalopram versus placebo in unipolar, recurrent depression. Methods Patients 18-65 years of age with recurrent unipolar major depression (DSM-IV), a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of greater than or equal to 22 and two or more previous depressive episodes, one within the past 5 years, were treated openly with citalopram (20-60 mg) for 6-9 weeks and, if responding, continued for 16 weeks before being randomised to double-blind maintenance treatment with citalopram or placebo for 48-77 weeks. Results A total of 427 patients entered acute treatment and 269 were randomised to double-blind treatment. Time to recurrence was longer in patients taking citalopram than in patients taking placebo (P < 0.001), Prophylactic treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions Citalopram(20,40 and 60 mg) is effective in the prevention of depressive recurrences. Patients at risk should continue maintenance treatment at the dose necessary to resolve symptoms in the acute treatment phase. Declaration of interest Funded by H. Lundbeck A/S.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available