4.0 Article

Blockade of effects of smoked marijuana by the CBl-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 322-328

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.322

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: SR141716, a recently developed CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, blocks acute effects of Delta -9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other CB1 cannabinoid agonists invitro and in animals. These findings suggest that CB1 receptors mediate many of the effects of marijuana, but this has not been evaluated in humans. Methods: Sixty-three healthy men with a history of marijuana use were randomly assigned to receive oral SR141716 or a placebo in an escalating dose (1, 3, 10, 30, and 90 mg) design. Each subject smoked an active (2.64%; THC) or placebo marijuana cigarette 2 hours later. Psychological effects associated with marijuana intoxication and heart rate were measured before and after antagonist and marijuana administration. Results: Single oral doses of SR141716 produced a significant dose-dependent blockade of marijuana-induced subjective intoxication and tachycardia. The 90-mg dose produced 38% to 43%; reductions in visual analog scale ratings of How high do you feel now? How stoned on marijuana are you now? and How strong. is the drug effect you feel now? and produced a 59% reduction in heart rate. SR141716 alone produced no significant physiological or psychological effects and did not affect peak THC plasma concentration or the area under the time x concentration curve. SR141716 was well tolerated by all subjects. Conclusions: SR141716 blocked acute psychological and physiological effects of smoked marijuana without altering THC pharmacokinetics. These findings confirm, for the first time in humans, the central role of CB1 receptors in mediating the effects of marijuana.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available