4.4 Article

ProQ Is an RNA Chaperone that Controls ProP Levels in Escherichia coli

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 50, Issue 15, Pages 3095-3106

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi101683a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [OPG0000508]
  2. Howard Hughes International Scholar program
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transporter ProP mediates osmolyte accumulation in Escherichia coli cells exposed to high osmolality media. The cytoplasmic ProQ protein amplifies ProP activity by an unknown mechanism. The N- and C-terminal domains of ProQ are predicted to be structurally similar to known RNA chaperone proteins FinO and Hfq from E. colt. Here we demonstrate that ProQ is an RNA chaperone, binding RNA and facilitating both RNA strand exchange and RNA duplexing. Experiments performed with the isolated ProQ domains showed that the FinO-like domain serves as a high-affinity RNA-binding domain, whereas the Hfq-like domain is largely responsible for RNA strand exchange and duplexing. These data suggest that ProQ may regulate ProP production. Transcription of proP proceeds from RpoD- and RpoS-dependent promoters. Lesions at proQ affected ProP levels in an osmolality- and growth phase-dependent manner, decreasing ProP levels when proP was expressed from its own chromosomal promoters or from a heterologous plasmid-based promoter. Small RNA molecules are known to regulate cellular levels of sigma factor RpoS. ProQ did not act by changing RpoS levels since proQ lesions did not influence RpoS-dependent stationary phase thermotolerance and they affected ProP production and activity similarly in bacteria without and with an rpoS defect. Taken together, these results suggest that ProQ does not regulate proP transcription. It may act as an RNA-binding protein to regulate proP translation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available