4.4 Article

Enhanced Base-Pair Opening in the Adenine Tract of a RNA Double Helix

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 50, Issue 11, Pages 1857-1863

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi1014997

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM077188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton exchange and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy are being used to characterize the kinetics and energetics of base-pair opening in two nucleic acid double helices. One is the RNA duplex 5'-r(GCGAUAAAAAGGCC)-3'/5'-r(GGCCUUUUUAUCGC)-3', which contains a central tract of five AU base pairs. The other is the homologous DNA duplex with a central tract of five AT base pairs. The rates and the equilibrium constants of the opening reaction of each base pair are measured from the dependence of the exchange rates of imino protons on ammonia concentration, at 10 C. The results reveal that the tract of AU base pairs in the RNA duplex differs from the homologous tract of AT base pairs in DNA in several ways. The rates of opening of AU base pairs in RNA are high and increase progressively along the tract, reaching their largest values at the 3'-end of the tract. In contrast, the opening rates of AT base pairs in DNA are much lower than those of AU base pairs. Within the tract, the largest opening rate is observed for the AT base pair at the 5'-end of the tract. These differences in opening kinetics are paralleled by differences in the stabilities of individual base pairs. All AU base pairs in the RNA are less stable than the AT base pairs in the DNA. The presence of the tract enhances these differences by increasing the stability of AT base pairs in DNA while decreasing the stability of AU base pairs in RNA. Due to these divergent trends, along the tracts, the AU base pairs become progressively less stable than AT base pairs. These findings demonstrate that tracts of AU base pairs in RNA have specific dynamic and energetic signatures that distinguish them from similar tracts of AT base pairs in DNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available