4.5 Article

Observation of IMF and seasonal effects in the location of auroral substorm onset

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 106, Issue A4, Pages 5799-5810

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2000JA003001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use Polar ultraviolet imager (UVI) and Wind observations to study the location of 648 well-defined Northern Hemisphere auroral breakups (substorm onsets) in response to interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientation and season. The most likely onset location is at 2230 MLT and 67 degrees Lambda (m) with half-maximum widths of 3 hours of MLT and 2 degrees Lambda (m), respectively. The onset latitude depends primarily on TMF B-z, but also B-x: the onset latitude decreases for B-x > 0 or B-z < 0 and increases for B-x < 0 or B-z > 0. The onset longitude depends on season and IMF By In summer, substorms tend to occur in the early evening at similar to 2200 MLT, whereas in winter they tend to occur near midnight at similar to 2300 MLT. The average summer-winter difference in the onset location is similar to1 hour of MLT. Large B-y effects on the onset longitude occur only when B-x and B-y are small. Onset locations shift toward earlier local times for B-y > 0 and toward midnight for B-y < 0. The average onset local time is earliest (2200 MLT) for B-y > 0 in summer and latest (2330 MLT) for B-y < 0 in winter. These dependencies coincide with those previously reported for the evening sector ionospheric zonal flow reversal in response to IMF B-y and season, indicating that auroral breakups are most likely in regions of large velocity shears. A weak dependence of the MLT onset location on the IMF B-x is identified: for B-x > 0 the onset location shifts toward dusk when B-y > 0 but toward dawn when B-y < 0; the sense of this shift reverses for B-x < 0. An implication of the results is that auroral breakup is not conjugate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available