4.4 Article

Identification of Catalytic Residues and Mechanistic Analysis of Family GH82 l-Carrageenases

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 49, Issue 35, Pages 7590-7599

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi1003475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Region Bretagne
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine polysaccharide degrading enzymes, and l-carrageenases in particular, have received little attention in the past, although their substrate specificity is of interest for biotechnological applications. This is mostly a consequence of the lack of data about their occurrence in the marine environment. Recent metagenomic data mining and the genome sequencing of a marine bacterium, Zobellia galactanivorans, led to the identification of three new l-carrageenase genes belonging to the glycoside hydrolase family GH82. The additional sequences helped to identify potential candidate residues as catalytic proton donor and nucleophile. We have identified the catalytic key residues experimentally by site-directed mutagenesis and subsequent kinetic analysis for the l-carrageenase from Alteromonas fortis CgiA1_Af. The kinetic analyses of the purified mutant enzymes confirm that E245 plays the role of the catalytic proton donor and D247 the general base that activates the catalytic water molecule. The point mutations of three other residues, namely, Q222, H281, and Q310 in A loll is, located in proximity of the active site also affect the enzyme activity. Our results indicate that E310 plays a role in stabilizing the substrate intermediate conformation, while 11281 is involved in substrate binding and appears to be crucial for maintaining the protonation state of the catalytic proton donor E245. The third residue, Q222, that bridges the catalytic water molecule and a chloride ion, plays a crucial role in structuring the water network in the active site of A. fortis l-carrageenase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available