4.6 Article

How age and daytime activities are related to insomnia in the general population: Consequences for older people

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 360-366

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49077.x

Keywords

insomnia; elderly; epidemiology; social activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of activity status and social life satisfaction on the report of insomnia symptoms and sleeping habits. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey using the Sleep-EVAL knowledge base system. SETTING: epresentative samples of three general populations (United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy). PARTICIPANTS: 13,057 subjects age 15 and older: 4,972 in the United Kingdom, 4,115 in Germany, and 3,970 in Italy. These subjects were representative of 160 million inhabitants. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical questionnaire on insomnia and investigation of associated pathologies (psychiatric and neurological disorders). RESULTS: Insomnia symptoms were reported by more than one-third of the population age 65 and older. Multivariate models she-wed that age was not a predictive factor of insomnia symptoms when controlling for activity status and social life satisfaction. The level of activity and social interactions had no influence on napping, but age was found to have a significant positive effect on napping. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the aging process per se is not responsible for the increase of insomnia often reported in older people. Instead, inactivity, dissatisfaction with social life, and the presence of organic diseases and mental disorders were the best predictors of insomnia, age being insignificant. Healthy older people (i.e., without organic or mental pathologies) have a prevalence of insomnia symptoms similar to that observed in younger people. Moreover, being active and satisfied with social life are protective factors against insomnia at any age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available