4.5 Article

Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by multi-body optimization: Performance of subject-specific knee joint models

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 48, Issue 14, Pages 3796-3802

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.040

Keywords

3D knee kinematics; Multi-body optimization; Soft tissue artifact; Subject-specific knee model; Squat

Funding

  1. FRQNT, Canada [15807]
  2. FRQ-S, Canada [2010-TS-137263]
  3. NSERC, Canada [CGSD2-425971-2012]
  4. CIHR
  5. Region Rhone-Alpe, France (EXPLORA PRO) [14 004462]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soft tissue artifact (STA) distort marker-based knee kinematics measures and make them difficult to use in clinical practice. None of the current methods designed to compensate for STA is suitable, but multibody optimization (MBO) has demonstrated encouraging results and can be improved. The goal of this study was to develop and validate the performance of knee joint models, with anatomical and subject-specific kinematic constraints, used in MBO to reduce STA errors. Twenty subjects were recruited: 10 healthy and 10 osteoarthritis (OA) subjects. Subject-specific knee joint models were evaluated by comparing dynamic knee kinematics recorded by a motion capture system (KneeKG (TM)) and optimized with MBO to quasi-static knee kinematics measured by a low-dose, upright, biplanar radiographic imaging system (EOS (R)). Errors due to STA ranged from 1.6 degrees to 22.4 degrees for knee rotations and from 0.8 mm to 14.9 mm for knee displacements in healthy and OA subjects. Subject-specific knee joint models were most effective in compensating for STA in terms of abduction-adduction, inter-external rotation and antero-posterior displacement. Root mean square errors with subject-specific knee joint models ranged from 2.2 +/- 1.2 degrees to 6.0 +/- 3.9 degrees for knee rotations and from 2.4 +/- 1.1 mm to 4.3 +/- 2.4 mm for knee displacements in healthy and OA subjects, respectively. Our study shows that MBO can be improved with subject-specific knee joint models, and that the quality of the motion capture calibration is critical. Future investigations should focus on more refined knee joint models to reproduce specific OA knee geometry and physiology. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available