4.2 Article

Microsomal metabolism of the terpene 1,8-cineole in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), koala (Phascolarctos cinereus), rat and human

Journal

XENOBIOTICA
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 205-221

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498250110043535

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1. This study reports on the pathways of metabolism and enzyme kinetics of the Eucalyptus terpene, 1,8-cineole, by liver microsomes from the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) and koala (Phascolarctos cinereus)(animals that normally include this terpene in their diet), rat and human. 2. The rank order of the ability to metabolize 1,8-cineole with respect to overall 1,8-cineole intrinsic clearance (CL'(int)= V-max/K-m in mul mg protein(-1) min(-1)) was koala (188) > possum (181) much greater than rat (28) human (12). This order supports the hypothesis that adaptation to a Eucalyptus diet involves enhanced metabolism of terpenes. 3. The metabolism of 1,8-cineole was also studied in the liver from brushtail possum pretreated with a mixture of terpenes, which have previously been shown to induce cytochrome P450 enzymes. Rats were pretreated with the same mixture of terpenes or phenobarbitone. 4. Terpene pretreatment more than doubled the CL'(int) of 1,8-cineole by brushtail possum liver microsomes (from 180 to 394 mul mg protein(-1) min(-1)) and increased rat CL'(int) by nearly 10-fold (from 28 to 259 mul mg protein(-1) min(-1)), but still less than the induced possum value. However, phenobarbitone had the greatest inducing effect, increasing the rat CL'(int) to 1825 mul mg protein(-1) min(-1). 5. A regioselective preference of oxidation was evident between adapted and non-adapted species. In rat and human oxidation was preferred at the aliphatic ring carbons over methyl substituents. In possum, many of the available carbons were utilized, however metabolism at methyl substituents was preferred. In the koala, oxidation occurred primarily at the methyl substituents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available