4.4 Article

Mechanistic Investigation of the Endo-α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase from Streptococcus pneumoniae R6

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 48, Issue 43, Pages 10334-10341

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi9013825

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM62116]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. The Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  4. BC Innovation Council
  5. Canada Research Chairs Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The large (1767-amino acid) endo-alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase from Streptococcus pneumoniae (SpGH101) specifically removes an O-linked disaccharide Gal-beta-1,3-GalNAc-alpha from glycoproteins, While the enzyme from natural sources has been used as a reagent for many years, very few mechanistic Studies have been performed. Using the recently determined three-dimensional structure of the recombinant protein as a background. we report here a mechanistic investigation of the SpGH101 retaining alpha-glycoside hydrolase using a combination of synthetic and natural substrates. On the basis of a model of the substrate complex of SpGH101, We propose D764 and E796 as the nucleophile and general acid-base residues, respectively. These roles were confirmed by kinetic and mechanistic analysis of mutants at those Positions using synthetic substrates and anion rescue experiments. pK(a) Values of 5.3 and 7.2 were assigned to D764 and E796 on the basis of the pK(a) values derived from the bell-shaped dependence of k(cat)/K-m, upon pH. The enzyme contains several putative carbohydrate binding modules whose glycan binding specificities were probed using the printed glycan array of the Consortium for Functional Glycomics using the inactive D764A and D764F mutants that had been labeled with Alexafluor 488. These studies revealed binding to galacto-N-biose, consistent with a role for these domains in localizing the enzyme near its substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available