4.7 Article

Differential effects of repeated ovarian stimulation on cytoplasmic and spindle organization in metaphase II mouse oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 757-764

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.4.757

Keywords

meiotic chromosomes; meiotic spindle; oocyte competence; ovarian stimulation

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-31907] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of four rounds of ovarian stimulation spaced la weeks apart on the normality of metaphase II (MII) spindle formation, chromosomal alignment and cytoplasmic organization were examined in intact ovulated mouse oocytes and at MII for oocytes obtained at the germinal vesicle stage from the same ovaries and matured in vitro. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDP nick-end labelling assay was used to identify DNA strand breaks in chromosomes, and histological studies of ovaries between and at each round of ovarian stimulation were performed. The results demonstrate a progressive and significant increase in the frequency of spindle defects with each round of ovarian stimulation, including those spaced weeks apart. Oocytes with spindle defects were also characterized by the occurrence of detached chromosomes and cytoplasmic asters. In contrast, in-vitro matured oocytes derived from the same ovaries were normal. No evidence of DNA strand breaks with repeated rounds of ovarian stimulation was detected in ovulated or in-vitro matured oocytes. The development and persistence of nodules of hypertrophied granulosa in regions where follicular growth occurs suggest that a progressively increasing proportion of oocytes in the ovulatory pathway may experience an intrafollicular milieu that has negative consequences for competence. The results are discussed with respect to ovarian and oocyte biological ageing and possible adverse implications for human oocyte competence with repeated hyperstimulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available