Journal
BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 2497-2509Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi7019194
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
- NCI NIH HHS [N01-CO-12400] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
beta(2)-Microglobulin (beta(2)-m) can form dialysis-related amyloid deposits. The structure of a fragment of beta(2)-m (K3, Ser20-Lys41) in the oligomeric state has recently been solved. We modeled equilibrium structures of K3 oligomers with different organizations (single and double layers) and morphologies (linear like and annular-like) for the wild-type and mutants using all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We focused on the sheet-to-sheet association force, which is the key in the amyloid organization and morphology. For the linear-like morphology, we observed two stable organizations: (i) single-layered parallel-stranded beta-sheets and (ii) double-layered parallel-stranded antiparallel beta-sheets stacked perpendicular to the fibril axis through the hydrophobic N-terminal-N-terminal (NN) interface. No stable annular structures were observed. The structural instability of the annular morphology was mainly attributed to electrostatic repulsion of three negatively charged residues (Asp15, Glu17, and Asp19) projecting from the same beta-strand surface. Linear-like and annular-like double-layered oligomers with the NN interface are energetically more favorable than other oligomers with C-terminal-C-terminal (CC) or C-terminal-N-tenninal (CN) interfaces, emphasizing the importance of hydrophobic interactions and side-chain packing in stabilizing these oligomers. Moreover, only linear-like structures, rather than annular structures, with parallel P-strands and antiparallel beta-sheet arrangements are possible intermediate states for the K3 beta(2)-M amyloid fibrils in solution. Comparing the beta(2)-M fragment with A beta indicates that while both adopt similar beta-strand-turn-beta-strand motifs, the final amyloid structures can be dramatically different in size, structure, and morphology due to differences in side-chain packing arrangements, intermolecular driving forces, sequence composition, and residue positions, suggesting that the mechanism leading to distinct morphologies and the aggregation pathways is sequence specific.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available