4.5 Article

Oriented nanofibrous silk as a natural scaffold for ocular epithelial regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages 1139-1151

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1078930

Keywords

silk; orientation; nanofibrous scaffold; limbal stem cells; cellular analyses

Funding

  1. ophthalmic research center grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to develop nanofibrous silk substrates for limbal stem cell expansion that can serve as a potential alternative substrate to replace human amniotic membrane. The human limbal stem cell was used to evaluate the biocompatibility of substrates (random and oriented nanofibrous mats, and human amniotic membrane) based on their phenotypic profile, viability, proliferation, and attachment ability. Biocompatibility results indicated that all substrates were highly biocompatible, as limbal stem cells could favorably attach and proliferate on the nanofibrous surfaces. Microscopic figures showed that the human limbal stem cells were firmly anchored to the substrates and were able to retain a normal corneal stem cell phenotype. Microscopic analyses illustrated that cells infiltrated the nanofibers and successfully formed a three-dimensional corneal epithelium, which was viable for 15days. Immunocytochemistry and real-time PCR results revealed no change in the expression profile of limbal stem cells grown on nanofibrous substrates when compared to those grown on human amniotic membrane. In addition, electrospun nanofibrous silk substrates especially oriented mat provides not only a milieu supporting limbal stem cells expansion, but also serve as a useful alternative carrier for ocular surface tissue engineering and could be used as an alternative substrate to amniotic membrane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available