4.7 Article

Restriction of secretory granule motion near the plasma membrane of chromaffin cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages 177-190

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.177

Keywords

evanescent field; exocytosis; diffusion; fluorescence microscopy; green fluorescent protein

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK27959, R01 DK50127] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [5T32GM07767] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [5F31MH12081] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS32385, NS38129] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to study quantitatively the motion and distribution of secretory granules near the plasma membrane (PM) of living bovine chromaffin cells. Within the similar to 300-nm region measurably illuminated by the evanescent field resulting from total internal reflection, granules are preferentially concentrated close to the PM. Granule motion normal to the substrate (the z direction) is much slower than would be expected from free Brownian motion, is strongly restricted over tens of nanometer distances, and tends to reverse directions within 0.5 s. The z-direction diffusion coefficients of granules decrease continuously by two orders of magnitude within less than a granule diameter of the PM as granules approach the PM. These analyses suggest that a system of tethers or a heterogeneous matrix severely limits granule motion in the immediate vicinity of the PM. Transient expression of the light chains of tetanus toxin and botulinum toxin A did not disrupt the restricted motion of granules near the PM. indicating that SNARE proteins SNAP-25 and VAMP are not necessary for the decreased mobility. However. the lack of functional SNAREs on the plasma or granule membranes in such cells reduces the time that some granules spend immediately adjacent to the PM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available