4.5 Article

Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: the interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 897, Issue 1-2, Pages 222-227

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)02224-7

Keywords

auditory scene analysis; MEG; MMN; sensory memory; scream segregation; temporal window of integration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study examined the relationship between two of the early brain processes of sound organization: auditory streaming and the temporal window of integration (TWT). Presented at a fast stimulus delivery rate, two tones alternating in frequency are perceived as separate streams of high and low sounds. However, when two sounds are presented within a ca. 200 ms temporal window, they are often processed as a single auditory event. Both stream se,segregation and temporal integration occur even in the absence of focused attention as was shown by their effect on the mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential. The goal of the present study was to determine the precedence between these two sound organization processes by using the stimulus-omission MMN paradigm. Infrequently omitting one stimulus from a homogeneous tone sequence only elicits an MMN when the stimulus onset asynchrony separating successive tones is shorter than 170 ms. This demonstrates the effect of the TWI. Magnetic brain responses elicited by infrequent stimulus omissions appearing in a sequence of two alternating tones were recorded. The magnetic MMN was elicited by tone omission when the alternating tones formed a single stream (with no or only small frequency separation between the two tones) but not when separate high and low streams emerged in perception (large frequency separation between the two alternating tones). This result shows that auditory streaming takes precedence over the processes of temporal integration. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available