4.3 Article

Discrimination and genetic diversity of cultivated and wild safflowers (Carthamus spp.) using EST-microsatellites markers

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 130-136

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2014.01.003

Keywords

EST-SSR; Safflower; Wild relatives; Genetic diversity

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In spite of being one of the major oilseed crops, little is known about genetic diversity and relationships between species of safflower. In this study EST-SSR markers were used to evaluate and characterize 42 genotypes from six species including Carthamus tinctorius, Carthamus palaestinus, Carthamus oxyacanthus, Carthamus lanatus, Carthamus dentatus, and Carthamus boissieri. Thirty three primer pairs produced 123 polymorphic bands with 2-8 alleles per locus. The EST-SSR markers showed different level of gene diversity. The highest Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) values were observed for primers EL510507 and EL390720 (0.49 and 0.45, respectively). The highest genetic diversity and heterozygosity were observed for C oxyacanthus. Both cluster and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) clearly separated species into distinct groups. Within each species the accessions were clustered in different subgroups that mainly supported the known origins. The result showed that C. palaestinus had the most genetic similarity with cultivated safflower and C. oxyacanthus was next in this respect. In general, EST-SSR markers effectively revealed the genetic relationships and diversity of Carthamus species. This information is valuable for safflower improvement since C. palaestinus and C. oxyacanthus are both crossable with the cultivated species C. tinctorius. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available