4.3 Article

Response of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) to temperature, polyamines and polyamine synthesis inhibitor

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4-6, Pages 749-757

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2011.06.015

Keywords

Prunus dulcis; Pollen germination; Pollen tube growth; Polyamine; Polyamine synthesis inhibitor

Funding

  1. Shahrekord University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prunus dulcis L. 'Mamaei' is grown widely in souhtwest of Iran. It blooms in early spring when temperatures are still low. Based on our knowledge there are no reports in the literature regarding pollen behavior of this cultivar under specified condition. Thus, the possible factors for low germination percentage in this cultivar have not been reported. The effect of three different temperatures (10, 25, or 35 degrees C), polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine) and polyamine synthesis inhibitor, methylglyoxals-bis (guanylhydrazone) (MGBG) on in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth were investigated in P. dulcis L 'Mamaei'. All temperatures and chemicals significantly affected both pollen germination percentage and pollen tube growth. In general, different polyamines stimulated the pollen germination percentage compared to the control at all temperatures, but increasing the temperature, particularly to 35 degrees C, had demonstrated inhibitory effects on pollen germination. At a concentration of 0.05 mM putrescine and spermidine and 0.005 and 0.025 mM spermine revealed longer pollen tube growth than that of the control at 10 degrees C, while higher concentrations tended to inhibit pollen tube growth. At 25 degrees C, most of the treatments had an inhibitory effect on pollen tube growth except for 0.25 mM putrescine and 0.005 mM spermine. which slightly stimulated pollen tube growth. Pollen germination and pollen tube growth were inhibited by MGBG at all temperatures and in all concentrations. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available