4.8 Article

Elevated levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein show a positive relationship with the severity of acute coronary syndromes

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 103, Issue 15, Pages 1955-1960

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.15.1955

Keywords

atherosclerosis; coronary disease; myocardial infarction; angina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-There is accumulating data that acute coronary syndromes relate to recent onset activation of inflammation affecting atherosclerotic plaques. Increased blood levels of oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox LDL) could play a role in these circumstances. Methods and Results-Ox-LDL levels were measured in 135 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI; n=45), unstable angina pectoris (UAP; n=45), and stable angina pectoris (SAP; n=45) and in 46 control subjects using a sandwich ELISA method. In addition, 33 atherectomy specimens obtained from a different cohort of patients with SAP (n=10) and UAP (n=23) were studied immunohistochemically for ox-LDL. In AMI patients, ox-LDL levels were significantly higher than in patients with UAP (P<0.0005) or SAP (P<0.0001) or in controls (P<0.0001) (AMI, 1.951.42 ng/5 mug LDL protein; UAP, 1.19 +/-0.74 ng/5 mug LDL protein; SAP, 0.89 +/-0.48 ng/5 mug LDL protein; control, 0.58 +/-0.23 ng/5 mug LDL protein). Serum levels of total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol did not differ among these patient groups. In the atherectomy specimens, the surface area containing ox-LDL-positive macrophages was significantly higher in patients with UAP than in those with SAP (P<0.0001). Conclusions-This study demonstrates that ox-LDL levels show a significant positive correlation with the severity of acute coronary syndromes and that the more severe lesions also contain a significantly higher percentage of ox-LDL-positive macrophages. These observations suggest that increased levels of ox LDL relate to plaque instability in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available