4.7 Article

The cuspy liner nucleus of the S0/A galaxy NGC 2681

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 551, Issue 1, Pages 197-205

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1086/320054

Keywords

galaxies : individual (NGC 2681); galaxies : nuclei; galaxies : photometry; galaxies : spiral

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nucleus of the bulge-dominated, multiply barred S0/a galaxy NGC 2681 is studied in detail using the high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope Faint Object Camera (FOC), Near-Infrared Camera and Multiobject Spectrometer (NICMOS) imaging, and the Faint Object Spectrograph (FOS). The ionized gas central velocity dispersion is found to increase by a factor approximate to2 when narrowing the aperture from R approximate to 1.5 (ground) to R approximate to 0.1 (FOS). Dynamical modeling of these velocity dispersions suggests that NGC 2681 does host a supermassive black hole (BH) for which one can estimate a firm mass upper limit M-BH less than or similar to 6 x 10(7) M. This upper limit is consistent with the relation between the central BH mass and velocity dispersion M-BH - sigma known for other galaxies. The emission-line ratios place the nucleus of NGC 2681 among LINERs. It is likely that the emission-line region comes from a rather mild, but steady, feeding of gas to the central BH in this galaxy. The inner stellar population lacks any measurable color gradient (to a radius of 0.6 kpc) from the infrared to the ultraviolet, consistently with FOC, FOS, and IUE data, all indicating that this system underwent a starburst approximate to1 Gyr ago that encompassed its whole interior, down to its very center. The most likely source of such a widely distributed starburst is the dumping of tidally extruded gas from a galaxy neighbor. If so, then NGC 2681 can be considered as the older brother of M82, seen face-on as opposed to the edge-on view we have for M82.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available